Loading...
 
Skip to main content

Common infrastructure licensing

Project foundations matter. A project's priority should be to build infrastructure.

But rushed infrastructure often neglects licensing. The Debian wiki is a great example of how even a highly licensing-aware project failing to specify a license on day 1 can remain a mess decades later. If a precious but unlicensed wiki page has contributions from someone who disappeared, can you integrate it in the product?

The Real™ prevention from these headaches, appropriation and forkability concerns is making a (default) license opt-out or mandatory on all contents, including documentation, websites, issue reports and discussions.

But if you're late or contributing to a project struggling to agree on a license, you can at least avoid worsening matters yourself by adding a notice to your own contributions.

License notices

You can copy the following notices to each “page” you contribute to, or link to the relevant one. The following anchor names are guaranteed stable:

The following license notices may evolve. If you are concerned about evolution, you may use the page history to link to a particular version of this page.

Ticket / issue report

All myWhen a contributor links to this section, “my contributions” means those made by that contributor. contributions to this issue report (ticket) without a copyright notice, including comments and attachments, are offered under the terms of the CC0 1.0 Universal public license, unless otherwise indicated.


Forum topic/thread

All myWhen a contributor links to this section, “my contributions” means those made by that contributor. contributions to this topic without a copyright notice, including attachments, are offered under the terms of the CC0 1.0 Universal public license, unless otherwise indicated.

Page last modified on Sunday March 29, 2026 15:14:11 UTC