Loading...
 
Skip to main content

No Food for Thought

Food is something you should provide to your brain long before coming to this blog. You will find no food recipes here, only raw, serious, non-fake news for mature minds.

A Week at Club Med Cancun - Technically not so Greatly Organized

admin Sunday October 14, 2018

I took a week of vacation and on a friend's suggestion, decided to spend it at Club Med's village in Cancun, Mexico. I had never tried Club Med, but I needed to relax and thought that by paying for quality, I would take a break from bugs, as well as from problems in general.

Bugs

Short version

I saw surprisingly few biological bugs in the village. A lot less than I expected. Unfortunately, I stayed in familiar ground as for computer bugs. At least 2 major bugs before my stay, at least 2 issues during my stay, and 1 bug after. I wish I was looking for an IT Manager job.

Long version

Even before I confirmed my choice, I hit a major bug in Club Med's website - the booking calendar was showing me the wrong prices (I believe it ignored my departure city). I still found the booking procedure impressive and tried to create an account. I hit another major bug right there, unable to create an account for days! I had to call an agent to book.

WiFi

Before you book, Club Med advertises the following:

clubmed.ca wrote:

What's included in your stay
Children Clubs for ages 4-17 + All-day gourmet dining & open bar + Unlimited water & land sports + Day & Night Entertainment + Wi-Fi & Gratuities = all inclusive


After you booked though, the formula gets more complicated:

Final voucher wrote:
As of November 1, 2016 basic WIFI access is included in your Club Med package. Premium WIFI is also available at an additional cost and can be purchased on site. Subject to change.

Of course, there is no useful description of each access type. So since I wasn't travelling for business, I didn't purchase premium WiFi.

The reception staff told me to install the Club Med Villages app on my cellphone. Over 24 hours after my arrival, and despite multiple attempts, I still hadn't managed to download the ~ 70 MB application on my cellphone. Plus, network was really bad on my laptop. So I went back to the reception, asked if that was normal, and since I couldn't get a useful answer, I gave in despite the feeling of deception and paid for the damn Premium WiFi access. I then tried to setup the Premium access on the cellphone - and was greeted by a DNS error. 2 young employees at the reception failed to help. After rebooting and multiple attempts, I gave up.

Over 2 days after my arrival, after I had given up, I noticed the installation had finally ended. I then tried to access my village, but that turned out even harder. A scrollbar stayed stuck at 100%. I gave up on that too a day later. Only after I came back home did I realize that the application was finally usable.

Salvaging the Unsalvageable?

Nevertheless, I liked many aspects of Club Med and felt compelled to help them improve. I was disappointed that no one asked me how my stay went when I left (probably because I left early). So when I saw an email asking for feedback, I decided to set aside my reluctance to waste time with surveys and took at least 20 minutes to fill it. Here's what I wrote at the last step:

Unexpected technical difficulties; 2 important issues booking (wrong prices, prolonged failure to create account), big issues with standard wifi even without trying to view any video, inability to use premium wifi on cellphone. Unable to use Club Med app on fresh cellphone during whole stay. Lost at least 4 hours due to technical issues overall. Made me wonder if I chose the right brand for a worry-free vacation, and would hesitate to recommend consequently

Exceptional welcome videos; poor TV

Sunday cocktail is a great idea

Great resort location, great architecture, great choice of activities

Great buffet

Was expecting to have bicycles for rent. Disappointed that reception staff couldn't even tell me where to go to rent one


I was 98% into the survey then. I hit Next... and all I got was an image. No confirmation that my feedback was submitted. I tried to go back, but the document had expired.
Gah - apparently half an hour more wasted. All of that on my main desktop, with Mozilla Firefox 60 (ESR).

Other types of bugs, other life forms and Beyond

Other than technical issues, there is wildlife at Club Med, as my photos show.

This was my first time at Club Med, but I learned that it was bought by a Chinese company. Does Club Med still offer the best all inclusive resorts in the concept it created, or is there now a better option for those looking for real quality? I don't mind paying some more (my whole week was around 1800 CAD, direct flight from Quebec City included).

Julbo photochromatic cycling glasses

admin Saturday October 13, 2018

This summer I looked for cycling glasses which would not only protect my eyes from the Sun, but also minimize the airflow. After careful research, I chose Julbo's Aerospeed, even though I couldn't find a local retailer to buy them from. I bought online from trekkINN for 173 CAD and thankfully, the glasses fit well. Just a couple disappointments:

  1. It wasn't clear whether these came with a single glass or several. In the end, there is one glass (and it cannot be removed).
  2. At night, there is important reflection. You get used to it, but it requires some more attention.

EasyPHP review - not so easy to choose over XAMPP

admin Monday October 8, 2018

In recent years, I ranted about 2 of the main options for installing a development AMP (Apache, PHP) stack (including Xdebug) on Windows, namely XAMPP and WampServer. I was hoping that I could be kinder towards EasyPHP, but after trying EasyPHP Devserver on Windows 8 for several months, I'm not very satisfied.

Before anything, I should note that my first attempt to install Devserver 17.0 failed. Oddly enough, it worked after I installed the same version on the same Windows install several months later.

Cost/limitations

The first thing to say is that unlike the others, EasyPHP is semi-commercial. It offers modules from a "warehouse". It costs 10 USD per year to access that warehouse.

I don't have a problem with asking to pay for special packages, but I feel that EasyPHP developers are trying to get users to pay for the basics. The warehouse offers an Xdebug Manager module, which must be great. But when you don't have that, Xdebug isn't even enabled, and there is no easy way to enable it. I think it's just a matter of having the correct zend_extension line in php.ini, and it may just be a matter of uncommenting (removing a semi-colon from) a disabled line, but I feel that in order to make their module interesting, EasyPHP developers have intentionally made default EasyPHP worse.

The other area where I smell this practice is PHP itself. The current version of EasyPHP ships with PHP 7.1.3, which is 1½-year-old. Much newer versions are available in the warehouse, but 7.1.3 feels like an old version to ship as default. There may be good reasons to wait before going to PHP 7.2, since existing applications need changes to adapt to PHP's backwards-incompatible changes, but when PHP 7.1 has reached 7.1.22, shipping 7.1.3 seems quite negligent.

Issues

The other thing is that while EasyPHP does have an issue tracker, it has in fact 2, 1 for Devserver and another entirely different one for Webserver, which presumably causes lots of duplication or difficulty finding already reported issues.

I hit several important issues with EasyPHP:

  1. The dashboard being inaccessible
  2. Opening dashboard sometimes restarts Apache httpd on a different port
  3. EasyPHP needs to be started every time I open a session. Plus, the dashboard needs to be opened for servers to start.


None of the first 2 had already been reported. And several months later, they remain unsolved.

Conclusion

After trying the 3 main options, I'm sorry to say I don't see a clear winner. WampServer is definitely the worst, but between EasyPHP and XAMPP, there is no clear winner. If you're willing to pay, EasyPHP might be a little better. If not, XAMPP probably wins narrowly in general, but I recommend to choose according to your needs and the precise packages and versions offered by each option at the time you choose.

Selected Select2? Better go with option #2

admin Sunday October 7, 2018

I haven't contributed much to Select2, a JavaScript library to replace native HTML select fields. And considering what happened to my latest contribution, just one of numerous issues managed unacceptably, I'm afraid that won't change.

As nothing was done to address concerns 20 days after the problem was brought to light, that will remain my last contribution to Select2, and I will not choose Select2 for any project. Which should not be a problem, as despite what the homepage still says, there are other options for advanced select fields, including Chosen.

Green or Grey: Subsidies for Cryptocurrencies?

admin Monday August 27, 2018

For as long as I have been adult, I have been part of a kind which was not common, at least at the time: an ecologist opposed to subsidies for green technologies. I have always believed in the polluter pays principle, which says we must discourage polluting activities (and not encourage less polluting activities). On specific cases, such as grey cars (more commonly called "green cars"), I disagreed with people I esteem. My stance has always been that we should not subsidize by 1 Euro to encourage use of cars that pollute "less", but rather tax usage of cars which pollute - including grey cars, such as hybrid cars.

On a topic which used to be completely different, since Bitcoin was created, I have been explaining to people why "cryptocurrencies" are worthless. For me, the crypto hype's intensity has always been a sad sign of how widespread the lack of economical education is.

Today, I read a news story which proved how bad the crypto hype has become: "Cryptocurrency" mining now accounts for almost 1% of the World's energy consumption. On the face of it, this is bad news for the environment.

But seeing what some are trying to minimize this issue proves more interesting. Capitalism is based on agents doing everything economically viable to maximize their gains (or at least - particularly in this case - the gains they expect). Mining is a race; if we make mining "more efficient", miners will simply mine even more; there is no end to the appetite for "coins" when companies buy into the frenzy and people start trying to make a living from mining. In this case, it becomes obvious that our simplistic inciting measures are useless at best.

The only way to end this madness, besides economic education, will be to internalize the cost of pollution. That may mean resisting pressure from lobbyists, but the good news is that will finance States, rather than using State means to finance those who degrade the environment.

L'Actualité décoré

admin Sunday July 22, 2018

L'Actualité est le magazine que j'ai le plus lu. En partie parce que mes parents me l'ont mis à portée de main, mais bien sur surtout pour son contenu. C'est mon magazine préféré. Je suis heureux de voir qu'il a mérité le Prix 2018 du meilleur magazine d’intérêt général de la Fondation des Prix pour les médias canadiens, et un total de 7 médailles. Je félicite d'ailleurs la décision récente de diminuer à 12 publications par an, permettant une plus grande profondeur.

Je suis tout aussi heureux de voir que sa journaliste Noémi Mercier a remporté la médaille d'or dans la catégorie Chroniques, pour sa chronique « Des gars, des filles », déjà mentionnée 2 fois sur ce blogue. Des chroniques de féminisme scientifique courtes (1 page de texte), mais qui méritent amplement cette distinction par leur qualité hors paire - Non multa sed multum.

AV1: A Victory for Open Video

admin Saturday July 14, 2018

Rejoice. One major component of modernity - video - can now be compressed using a stable, specified and fully open royalty-free video codec, with AV1, which is also most efficient.
I did not play any role in this achievement, so I have to thank all contributors, notably Google, Cisco, Mozilla, VideoLAN, IBM, Intel, AMD, ARM, Microsoft, Netflix and NVIDIA, BBC, Amazon and Realtek.

Impatiently waiting for an AV1-ready environment

2023 Update: We're getting there...

Wikimedia Foundation Board of Trustees Elections 2015

admin Thursday May 17, 2018

I voted in this year's Wikimedia Foundation Board of Trustees Elections. I had only interacted with 1 candidate and since I was almost focusing entirely on governance, I was neutral for almost all candidates, except:

  • Supported Dariusz Jemielniak, who has spoken against bureaucracy (although I consider his specific proposition of setting a firm limit to the volume of policies as a bureaucratic proposition... despite its anti-bureaucratic purpose).
  • Supported James Heilman for his general impression
  • Confidently supported Tim Davenport for being reform minded and critical of bureaucracy, and his intention of oversighting WMF.
  • Opposed Samuel Klein, simply because he is proposing term limits (we need less rules, not more arbitrary rules!)


By the way, WMF, please make it easy for voters to fix or at least report problems (such as the large number of broken links (anchors) to candidate presentations). And allow us to modify our vote (or at least warn us we would need to start from scratch to do so).

And as for candidates, most of your presentations say a little too much about your past and too little about your intentions.

SPID: 4233
-----BEGIN PGP MESSAGE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
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=M701
-----END PGP MESSAGE-----

Wikimedia Foundation Board of Trustees Elections 2017

admin Sunday May 6, 2018

I voted in the Wikimedia Foundation Board of Trustees Elections 2017. I had interacted with no candidate and was neutral for most candidates, but I supported:

  • María Sefidari, for her work on transparency.
  • Dariusz Jemielniak, for his huge knowledge of Wikimedia, his work on transparency, and his past stance against bureaucracy
  • James Heilman (general impression)
  • Peter Gallert, for his goal of improving transparency


As in the 2015 elections, there is no way to modify our vote (submitting a new vote would require to fill a new vote form from scratch).

As in the 2015 elections, I hit an important issue voting. But I managed to report it this time.

SPID: 16259
-----BEGIN PGP MESSAGE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
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=J3Aw
-----END PGP MESSAGE-----